![]() |
MOQ: | 1 Pcs |
Price: | USD 95-450 |
Standard Packaging: | Naked |
Delivery Period: | 8-10 work days |
Payment Method: | L/C,D/P,T/T |
Supply Capacity: | 60000ton/year |
Temporary Steel Panel Bridge/steel Panel Bridge For Sale
Comparison of environmental impacts between Bailey Bridge and Traditional Bridge
Bailey Bridge has significant advantages over traditional bridges in terms of environmental impact. The following is a comparison of the environmental impacts of the two at different stages:
1. **Construction phase**
- **Site preparation and foundation work**:
- **Bailey Bridge**: Bailey Bridge installation usually requires less site preparation and foundation work. Its modular design allows for rapid construction without large-scale excavation or land leveling, significantly reducing disturbance to the surrounding ecosystem.
- **Traditional Bridge**: Traditional bridge construction often requires a lot of excavation and land leveling, which can lead to habitat destruction and soil erosion.
- **Material use**:
- **Bailey Bridge**: Bailey Bridge mainly uses steel, which is not only durable but also recyclable. In addition, its prefabricated components reduce on-site construction time, further reducing the impact on the environment.
- **Traditional Bridge**: Traditional bridges usually use concrete and steel, which are energy-intensive to produce and have a greater impact on the environment.
2. **Operation phase**
- **Ecological impact**:
- **Bailey bridge**: The lightweight design of Bailey bridge reduces disturbance to surrounding ecosystems, especially in ecologically sensitive areas such as wetlands and rivers.
- **Traditional bridge**: Traditional bridges may cause habitat fragmentation, affecting the migration and survival of wildlife.
- **Water quality impact**:
- **Bailey bridge**: The surface treatment and material selection of Bailey bridge can reduce pollutants brought by rainwater erosion and protect water quality.
- **Traditional bridge**: The maintenance and use of traditional bridges may release more pollutants and affect water quality.
3. **Maintenance phase**
- **Maintenance requirements**:
- **Bailey bridge**: The modular design of Bailey bridge makes its maintenance requirements lower and the maintenance work is generally simpler.
- **Traditional bridge**: Traditional bridges require more frequent maintenance, especially in harsh environments, which increases maintenance costs and environmental impact.
4. **Demolition phase**
- **Material recycling**:
- **Bailey bridge**: Bailey bridge components can be easily disassembled and recycled, reducing waste generation.
- **Traditional bridge**: The demolition of traditional bridges usually generates a large amount of construction waste and has a low material recycling rate.
Summary
Bailey bridges exhibit low environmental impact in the construction, operation, maintenance and demolition phases. Their modular design, rapid assembly capabilities, lightweight materials and recyclability make them a more environmentally friendly and sustainable bridge solution. In contrast, traditional bridges have greater environmental interference during construction, more significant ecological impacts during operation and maintenance, and more complex waste disposal after demolition.
By adopting Bailey bridges, we can better protect the environment and achieve sustainable development while meeting infrastructure needs.
Specifications:
CB200 Truss Press Limited Table | |||||||||
NO. | Internal Force | Structure Form | |||||||
Not Reinforced Model | Reinforced Model | ||||||||
SS | DS | TS | QS | SSR | DSR | TSR | QSR | ||
200 | Standard Truss Moment(kN.m) | 1034.3 | 2027.2 | 2978.8 | 3930.3 | 2165.4 | 4244.2 | 6236.4 | 8228.6 |
200 | Standard Truss Shear (kN) | 222.1 | 435.3 | 639.6 | 843.9 | 222.1 | 435.3 | 639.6 | 843.9 |
201 | High Bending Truss Moment(kN.m) | 1593.2 | 3122.8 | 4585.5 | 6054.3 | 3335.8 | 6538.2 | 9607.1 | 12676.1 |
202 | High Bending Truss Shear(kN) | 348 | 696 | 1044 | 1392 | 348 | 696 | 1044 | 1392 |
203 | Shear Force of Super High Shear Truss(kN) | 509.8 | 999.2 | 1468.2 | 1937.2 | 509.8 | 999.2 | 1468.2 | 1937.2 |
CB200 Table of Geometric Characteristics of Truss Bridge(Half Bridge) | ||||
Structure | Geometric Characteristics | |||
Geometric Characteristics | Chord Area(cm2) | Section Properties(cm3) | Moment of Inertia(cm4) | |
ss | SS | 25.48 | 5437 | 580174 |
SSR | 50.96 | 10875 | 1160348 | |
DS | DS | 50.96 | 10875 | 1160348 |
DSR1 | 76.44 | 16312 | 1740522 | |
DSR2 | 101.92 | 21750 | 2320696 | |
TS | TS | 76.44 | 16312 | 1740522 |
TSR2 | 127.4 | 27185 | 2900870 | |
TSR3 | 152.88 | 32625 | 3481044 | |
QS | QS | 101.92 | 21750 | 2320696 |
QSR3 | 178.36 | 38059 | 4061218 | |
QSR4 | 203.84 | 43500 | 4641392 |
CB321(100) Truss Press Limited Table | |||||||||
No. | Lnternal Force | Structure Form | |||||||
Not Reinforced Model | Reinforced Model | ||||||||
SS | DS | TS | DDR | SSR | DSR | TSR | DDR | ||
321(100) | Standard Truss Moment(kN.m) | 788.2 | 1576.4 | 2246.4 | 3265.4 | 1687.5 | 3375 | 4809.4 | 6750 |
321(100) | Standard Truss Shear (kN) | 245.2 | 490.5 | 698.9 | 490.5 | 245.2 | 490.5 | 698.9 | 490.5 |
321 (100) Table of geometric characteristics of truss bridge(Half bridge) | |||||||||
Type No. | Geometric Characteristics | Structure Form | |||||||
Not Reinforced Model | Reinforced Model | ||||||||
SS | DS | TS | DDR | SSR | DSR | TSR | DDR | ||
321(100) | Section properties(cm3) | 3578.5 | 7157.1 | 10735.6 | 14817.9 | 7699.1 | 15398.3 | 23097.4 | 30641.7 |
321(100) | Moment of inertia(cm4) | 250497.2 | 500994.4 | 751491.6 | 2148588.8 | 577434.4 | 1154868.8 | 1732303.2 | 4596255.2 |
Advantage
Possessing the features of simple structure,
convenient transport, speedy erection
easy disassembling,
heavy loading capacity,
great stability and long fatigue life
being capable of an alternative span, loading capacity
![]() |
MOQ: | 1 Pcs |
Price: | USD 95-450 |
Standard Packaging: | Naked |
Delivery Period: | 8-10 work days |
Payment Method: | L/C,D/P,T/T |
Supply Capacity: | 60000ton/year |
Temporary Steel Panel Bridge/steel Panel Bridge For Sale
Comparison of environmental impacts between Bailey Bridge and Traditional Bridge
Bailey Bridge has significant advantages over traditional bridges in terms of environmental impact. The following is a comparison of the environmental impacts of the two at different stages:
1. **Construction phase**
- **Site preparation and foundation work**:
- **Bailey Bridge**: Bailey Bridge installation usually requires less site preparation and foundation work. Its modular design allows for rapid construction without large-scale excavation or land leveling, significantly reducing disturbance to the surrounding ecosystem.
- **Traditional Bridge**: Traditional bridge construction often requires a lot of excavation and land leveling, which can lead to habitat destruction and soil erosion.
- **Material use**:
- **Bailey Bridge**: Bailey Bridge mainly uses steel, which is not only durable but also recyclable. In addition, its prefabricated components reduce on-site construction time, further reducing the impact on the environment.
- **Traditional Bridge**: Traditional bridges usually use concrete and steel, which are energy-intensive to produce and have a greater impact on the environment.
2. **Operation phase**
- **Ecological impact**:
- **Bailey bridge**: The lightweight design of Bailey bridge reduces disturbance to surrounding ecosystems, especially in ecologically sensitive areas such as wetlands and rivers.
- **Traditional bridge**: Traditional bridges may cause habitat fragmentation, affecting the migration and survival of wildlife.
- **Water quality impact**:
- **Bailey bridge**: The surface treatment and material selection of Bailey bridge can reduce pollutants brought by rainwater erosion and protect water quality.
- **Traditional bridge**: The maintenance and use of traditional bridges may release more pollutants and affect water quality.
3. **Maintenance phase**
- **Maintenance requirements**:
- **Bailey bridge**: The modular design of Bailey bridge makes its maintenance requirements lower and the maintenance work is generally simpler.
- **Traditional bridge**: Traditional bridges require more frequent maintenance, especially in harsh environments, which increases maintenance costs and environmental impact.
4. **Demolition phase**
- **Material recycling**:
- **Bailey bridge**: Bailey bridge components can be easily disassembled and recycled, reducing waste generation.
- **Traditional bridge**: The demolition of traditional bridges usually generates a large amount of construction waste and has a low material recycling rate.
Summary
Bailey bridges exhibit low environmental impact in the construction, operation, maintenance and demolition phases. Their modular design, rapid assembly capabilities, lightweight materials and recyclability make them a more environmentally friendly and sustainable bridge solution. In contrast, traditional bridges have greater environmental interference during construction, more significant ecological impacts during operation and maintenance, and more complex waste disposal after demolition.
By adopting Bailey bridges, we can better protect the environment and achieve sustainable development while meeting infrastructure needs.
Specifications:
CB200 Truss Press Limited Table | |||||||||
NO. | Internal Force | Structure Form | |||||||
Not Reinforced Model | Reinforced Model | ||||||||
SS | DS | TS | QS | SSR | DSR | TSR | QSR | ||
200 | Standard Truss Moment(kN.m) | 1034.3 | 2027.2 | 2978.8 | 3930.3 | 2165.4 | 4244.2 | 6236.4 | 8228.6 |
200 | Standard Truss Shear (kN) | 222.1 | 435.3 | 639.6 | 843.9 | 222.1 | 435.3 | 639.6 | 843.9 |
201 | High Bending Truss Moment(kN.m) | 1593.2 | 3122.8 | 4585.5 | 6054.3 | 3335.8 | 6538.2 | 9607.1 | 12676.1 |
202 | High Bending Truss Shear(kN) | 348 | 696 | 1044 | 1392 | 348 | 696 | 1044 | 1392 |
203 | Shear Force of Super High Shear Truss(kN) | 509.8 | 999.2 | 1468.2 | 1937.2 | 509.8 | 999.2 | 1468.2 | 1937.2 |
CB200 Table of Geometric Characteristics of Truss Bridge(Half Bridge) | ||||
Structure | Geometric Characteristics | |||
Geometric Characteristics | Chord Area(cm2) | Section Properties(cm3) | Moment of Inertia(cm4) | |
ss | SS | 25.48 | 5437 | 580174 |
SSR | 50.96 | 10875 | 1160348 | |
DS | DS | 50.96 | 10875 | 1160348 |
DSR1 | 76.44 | 16312 | 1740522 | |
DSR2 | 101.92 | 21750 | 2320696 | |
TS | TS | 76.44 | 16312 | 1740522 |
TSR2 | 127.4 | 27185 | 2900870 | |
TSR3 | 152.88 | 32625 | 3481044 | |
QS | QS | 101.92 | 21750 | 2320696 |
QSR3 | 178.36 | 38059 | 4061218 | |
QSR4 | 203.84 | 43500 | 4641392 |
CB321(100) Truss Press Limited Table | |||||||||
No. | Lnternal Force | Structure Form | |||||||
Not Reinforced Model | Reinforced Model | ||||||||
SS | DS | TS | DDR | SSR | DSR | TSR | DDR | ||
321(100) | Standard Truss Moment(kN.m) | 788.2 | 1576.4 | 2246.4 | 3265.4 | 1687.5 | 3375 | 4809.4 | 6750 |
321(100) | Standard Truss Shear (kN) | 245.2 | 490.5 | 698.9 | 490.5 | 245.2 | 490.5 | 698.9 | 490.5 |
321 (100) Table of geometric characteristics of truss bridge(Half bridge) | |||||||||
Type No. | Geometric Characteristics | Structure Form | |||||||
Not Reinforced Model | Reinforced Model | ||||||||
SS | DS | TS | DDR | SSR | DSR | TSR | DDR | ||
321(100) | Section properties(cm3) | 3578.5 | 7157.1 | 10735.6 | 14817.9 | 7699.1 | 15398.3 | 23097.4 | 30641.7 |
321(100) | Moment of inertia(cm4) | 250497.2 | 500994.4 | 751491.6 | 2148588.8 | 577434.4 | 1154868.8 | 1732303.2 | 4596255.2 |
Advantage
Possessing the features of simple structure,
convenient transport, speedy erection
easy disassembling,
heavy loading capacity,
great stability and long fatigue life
being capable of an alternative span, loading capacity